Search by Category
- F - Bankruptcy 1
- F - Certificates of Pending Litigation 1
- F - Child Support 31
- F - Common Law 3
- F - Corporate Income 2
- F - Divorce 7
- F - Domestic Contract 7
- F - Domestic Violence 3
- F - Emergency Relief 1
- F - Equalization 4
- F - Equitable Remedy 1
- F - Exclusive Possession 2
- F - Family Responsibility Office 2
- F - Final Order 1
- F - Imputing Income 11
- F - Jurisdiction 1
- F - Limitation Periods 1
- F - Matrimonial Home 17
- F - Net Family Property 31
- F - Occupational Rent 4
- F - Pension 2
- F - Preservation 1
- F - Property 47
- F - Restraining 1
- F - Resulting Trust 3
- F - Retroactive Support 5
- F - Section 7 Expenses 7
- F - Spousal Support 27
- F - Standard Procedure 1
- F - Trust 1
- F-Certificate of Pending Litigation 1
- F-Decision-Making 6
- F-Exclusions 2
- F-Mobility 11
- F-OCL 1
- F-Parenting 37
- F-Parenting Time 11
- F-Preservation Orders 2
- F-Relocation 12
- F-Travel 2
- F-unjust enrichment 7
- Frequently Cited Cases 14
- Post-Separation Increases 1
Compensatory Basis v. Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.
Navigating the complexities of spousal support can be overwhelming, particularly in the wake of a divorce or separation. This article aims to shed light on the theoretical explanations for statutory spousal support as developed by the Supreme Court of Canada. Our focus will be on the Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support, and the Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.
Spousal Support
Spousal support refers to a series of payments made from one spouse to another following their separation. This critical aspect of family law involves several key factors and guidelines set by Canadian law to ensure fairness and promote self-sufficiency.
Spousal Support Calculations: the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines
The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG) provide a framework for determining the amount of spousal support, using one of three different formulas. These formulas, while complicated, are the tools that family lawyers and courts use to ensure fair and equitable spousal support arrangements.
Spousal Support Order Variation
When a support order lacks a specific provision for a review, either party has the right to bring forward a motion to alter the initial order. However, for this motion to be successful, the party leading the motion must demonstrate a change in circumstances. For instance, if the recipient spouse begins earning a significant income, this could be a valid reason for the review of the support order. This process is often complex, requiring the consideration of numerous factors.
Securing Ongoing Support Payments in Family Law
The primary objective of securing ongoing support payments is to mitigate risk. Without some form of security, there is a chance that the payor could predecease the recipient, causing an abrupt halt to the support. This could occur while the recipient still has a valid claim or need for these payments. By having a secure plan in place, it ensures that the recipient will not be left in a lurch should the payor pass away. The security serves to protect the recipient's interests, ensuring they are compensated for their outstanding claim.
How to Secure Support Obligations in Family Law
Support obligations in family law are commonly secured by life insurance policies. However, there are situations where obtaining insurance may not be feasible for the support payor due to eligibility issues or prohibitive costs. In such instances, alternative methods for securing support have to be considered. This blog post will provide a detailed discussion on several alternatives: life insurance, first charge on the payor’s estate, pension or RRSP beneficiary designation, money held in trust, a letter of credit, and a conditional lien against property.
Spousal Support: Factors Influencing Court Decisions
The factors that influence the decisions regarding spousal support is crucial for both recipients and payors. This knowledge can greatly aid in navigating this complex area of family law, ensuring a fair and equitable outcome for all parties involved.
The Termination of Support Orders
The termination of ongoing support orders can be a complex and challenging process, especially for payor spouses. Most court orders or agreements for child support have a standard termination clause, but spousal support orders rarely do. In this blog post, we'll explore three crucial factors payor spouses should consider when they seek to terminate support through the courts.
The Process and Implications of Setting Aside Waivers in Family Law.
The realm of family law is vast and intricate, with numerous nuances that make it a complex field to navigate. One such nuance that often takes precedence is the concept of setting aside waivers, particularly those pertaining to spousal support. Given the potential for significant financial implications, spouses frequently challenge these waivers in the context of marital contracts. The process of setting aside waivers is complex, but understanding it can help mitigate potential future legal disputes and foster a smoother legal process.
The Implications of Spousal Support Agreements
Spousal support agreements often come into play in the context of marital or relationship separations. These contracts, whether established before or during the relationship, outline the financial obligations of each party post-separation. They may specify whether any spousal support will be paid, the duration of such payments, and the amount, often influenced by factors such as the length of the marriage and number of children. However, the enforcement and validity of these agreements can become contentious upon separation.
Challenging Domestic Contracts in Ontario
Domestic contracts, such as cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements, play a crucial role in managing and settling matters in a relationship. However, there may be circumstances where one party wishes to challenge the terms or validity of these contracts. Ontario's Family Law Act (FLA) sets out the grounds for setting aside a domestic contract.
Property Ownership After Separation
Domestic contracts, such as cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements, play a crucial role in managing and settling matters in a relationship. However, there may be circumstances where one party wishes to challenge the terms or validity of these contracts. Ontario's Family Law Act (FLA) sets out the grounds for setting aside a domestic contract.
A Joint Family Venture
A Joint Family Venture is a legal construct that is invoked to typify a unique kind of relationship among two or more individuals. For the court to recognize a JFV, the existence of four pivotal factors is essential: mutual effort, economic integration, actual intent, and priority of the family. These elements also encompass considerations such as whether the parties worked collaboratively towards common goals, used pooled resources for family purposes, and whether there was a mutual decision to raise children together. Each of these factors, while distinct, often overlap and interlace, painting a comprehensive picture of the relationship under scrutiny.
Domestic Contracts in Ontario
In Ontario, there are five types of domestic contracts that are permitted as outlined in Part IV of the Family Law Act (FLA). These include cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, separation agreements, paternity agreements, and family arbitration agreements.
Formal Validity of Domestic Contracts in Ontario
In Ontario, the Family Law Act (FLA) sets out the code for domestic contracts, starting with what is required for formal validity. These requirements ensure that these legal agreements are enforceable and serve their intended purpose effectively.
Independent Legal Advice in Domestic Contracts
When it comes to domestic contracts, acquiring independent legal advice (ILA) is not just a suggestion—it's a necessity. These contracts, which can include cohabitation agreements, marriage contracts, and separation agreements, among others, have significant legal implications. Consequently, understanding the stipulations and the potential consequences of signing such a contract is crucial. This is where ILA comes into play.
Cohabitation in Ontario
In Ontario, cohabitation is defined as "to live together in a conjugal relationship, whether within or outside marriage.” This inclusive definition extends to same-sex couples as well. The Family Law Act (FLA) of Ontario provides certain guidelines to ascertain whether a couple is cohabiting. These guidelines encompass both apparent factors like living and sleeping together, and less evident ones such as the sharing of household tasks. The evaluation of cohabitation often hinges on a combination of these factors, making it a complex process that requires a nuanced understanding of the law.
Severance in Divorce
Severance in a divorce context refers to the process where the divorce is granted and finalized while some or all of the corollary issues are still being negotiated or litigated. These issues can include anything from property division to spousal support to child custody arrangements. It essentially allows the termination of the marriage to be treated separately from the other issues, enabling the parties involved to obtain a divorce and move forward with their lives even as the other issues remain unresolved.
The Process and Reasons for Resisting Severance of Divorce
There are several reasons why spouses may wish to oppose a severance motion. These include the potential loss of eligibility for healthcare insurance under the other spouse's employee benefits plan and the loss of rights with respect to the matrimonial home under Part II of the Family Law Act.
The Divorce Act
Navigating the often complex terrain of divorce can be a daunting task. The Divorce Act (DA) in Canada provides the legal framework for divorce proceedings, but understanding the DA's provisions can be challenging. This post aims to provide information with respect to some of the key sections of the DA, helping you to understand your legal rights and obligations during a divorce