Compensatory Basis v. Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.
Introduction
Navigating the complexities of spousal support can be overwhelming, particularly in the wake of a divorce or separation. This article aims to shed light on the theoretical explanations for statutory spousal support as developed by the Supreme Court of Canada. Our focus will be on the Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support, and the Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.
The Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support
The Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support, as identified in Moge v. Moge, views spousal support as a form of compensation for losses of economic opportunities during a marriage. This perspective was pivotal in shifting the focus of spousal support from merely promoting economic self-sufficiency to compensating the spouse who made economic sacrifices during the marriage. For instance, if one spouse left their career to care for children, allowing the other to advance in their career, the higher income-earning spouse is required to compensate the other spouse for their sacrifice.
The Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support
The Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support, highlighted in Bracklow v. Bracklow, deals with scenarios where a spouse has a need for support at the time of separation that is not connected to the roles adopted during the marriage. For instance, a spouse who becomes disabled in the months leading up to separation and cannot work cannot point to the other spouse as the cause for their predicament. In such cases, there is an obligation to pay spousal support based on need alone, without the necessity of demonstrating some loss that is being compensated for.
The Importance of Standard of Living
In both compensatory and non-compensatory claims, the recipient spouse’s need for support should be evaluated based on their usual standard of living and the income now available to them since separation. This allows for a more equitable distribution of resources, ensuring that neither spouse is unfairly disadvantaged due to the breakdown of the marriage.
The Role of the Court in Determining Spousal Support
The decision to award spousal support, as well as the amount and duration of that support, is ultimately determined by a court. This decision is made in the context of the principles set out in the federal Divorce Act and the Family Law Act. The court considers a range of factors such as the length of the marriage, the roles of each spouse during the marriage, and the ability of the payor spouse to provide support.
Factors Influencing Spousal Support Decisions
Beyond the theoretical bases for support, there are a variety of factors that can influence a court’s decision on spousal support. These include but are not limited to:
The financial resources, needs, and obligations of both spouses
The duration of the marriage or cohabitation
The roles of each spouse during the marriage
The effect of those roles and the breakdown of the marriage on both spouses’ current financial positions
The ongoing responsibility for the care of children
These factors provide a flexible framework, allowing the court to tailor spousal support awards to the unique circumstances of each case.
The Impact of Precedents on Spousal Support
Previous court decisions, or precedents, also play a vital role in shaping spousal support outcomes. These precedents help establish a common understanding and expectation about the appropriate range of spousal support awards in different types of cases.
Modifying Spousal Support Orders
It's essential to note that spousal support orders are not set in stone. They can be varied or even terminated if there is a material change in circumstances. This could include a significant change in the income or needs of either spouse, or the remarriage or cohabitation of the spouse receiving support.
Conclusion
While the principles of spousal support can be complex, understanding these key concepts can provide valuable guidance during a separation or divorce. It's crucial to seek legal advice to ensure that your rights are protected and that a fair and equitable resolution is reached.
THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.
The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.
The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.
No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.
Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.