Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Family Law Principles that we can learn from Thompson v. Thompson 2013 ONSC 5500 (Post Separation Increases in a Payor’s Income)

Thus, some general principles guide and inform the court’s exercise of discretion on this issue. A spouse is not automatically entitled to increased spousal support when the other spouse’s post–separation income increases. The right to share in post-separation income increases typically does not arise in non-compensatory claims. However, compensatory support claims may provide a foundation for entitlement to share in post-separation income increases in certain circumstances.

Read More
Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Family Law Principles that we can learn from Thompson v. Thompson 2013 ONSC 5500 (Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines)

The SSAG were developed around two basic formulas, namely the Without Child Support formula, which applies when the recipient spouse is not receiving any child support, and the With Child Support formula, which comes into play when there are dependent children of the relationship who are eligible for child support.

Read More
Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal Frequently Cited Cases, F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Family Law Principles that we can learn from Thompson v. Thompson 2013 ONSC 5500 (Spousal Support)

Sections 15.2(1) and (2) of the Divorce Act, the court has jurisdiction to make either an interim or final order requiring a spouse to pay such spousal support as the court considers reasonable. The determination of what is reasonable takes into account various factors such as the length of time the spouses cohabited, the functions performed by each spouse during cohabitation, and any order, agreement or arrangements relating to support of either spouse.

Read More

Thompson v. Thompson 2013 ONSC 5500

The blog post provides a detailed examination of the court case Thompson v. Thompson 2013 ONSC 5500, which involved issues of divorce, child support, and spousal support. It explores various aspects such as the grounds for divorce, retroactive support claims, residential situation of the child, and assessment of parties' incomes.

This case also looks at: Imputing pre-tax corporate income, intentional un/under-employment

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines in Canada

The Advisory Guidelines are a valuable tool for legal professionals and couples navigating the complexities of spousal support. They offer a systematic approach to determining support, reflecting the principles and jurisprudence that have developed under the Divorce Act (DA) in Canada. They have been approved for use by the Court of Appeal for Ontario, further cementing their importance in the legal system.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Exceptions to the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG)

The Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAG) are intended to provide a fair and standardized approach to spousal support, but they are not one-size-fits-all. There are several scenarios where deviations from the norm are permitted. This post will delve into several exceptions to the SSAG, including cases involving high or low payor income, compelling interim financial circumstances, debt payment, and more.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

The Process of Spousal Support After Separation

Spousal support after separation can often be a contentious and emotionally charged issue. It's critical to understand the process and the steps needed to ensure a fair outcome for all parties involved. This blog post will discuss the importance of prompt action, the evidence required for a motion, and the best practices to protect your position.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Lump-Sum Spousal Support

Courts possess the authority to order lump-sum spousal support under certain acts. Section 34(b) of the Ontario Family Law Act and Section 15.2 of the Divorce Act provide the legal basis for such orders. However, courts rarely exercise this authority. Some factors that could lead to a lump-sum spousal support order include relieving financial hardship, the payor's ability to make a lump sum payment without undermining future self-sufficiency, and the risk of non-payment of periodic payments.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Compensatory Basis v. Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.

Navigating the complexities of spousal support can be overwhelming, particularly in the wake of a divorce or separation. This article aims to shed light on the theoretical explanations for statutory spousal support as developed by the Supreme Court of Canada. Our focus will be on the Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support, and the Non-Compensatory Basis for Spousal Support.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Spousal Support

Spousal support refers to a series of payments made from one spouse to another following their separation. This critical aspect of family law involves several key factors and guidelines set by Canadian law to ensure fairness and promote self-sufficiency.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Spousal Support Order Variation

When a support order lacks a specific provision for a review, either party has the right to bring forward a motion to alter the initial order. However, for this motion to be successful, the party leading the motion must demonstrate a change in circumstances. For instance, if the recipient spouse begins earning a significant income, this could be a valid reason for the review of the support order. This process is often complex, requiring the consideration of numerous factors.

Read More
F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal F - Spousal Support Jas Dhaliwal

Securing Ongoing Support Payments in Family Law

The primary objective of securing ongoing support payments is to mitigate risk. Without some form of security, there is a chance that the payor could predecease the recipient, causing an abrupt halt to the support. This could occur while the recipient still has a valid claim or need for these payments. By having a secure plan in place, it ensures that the recipient will not be left in a lurch should the payor pass away. The security serves to protect the recipient's interests, ensuring they are compensated for their outstanding claim.

Read More