Parenting time refers to the schedule by which children live with their parents. This schedule is not dictated by a specific formula but is established based on each child's best interest. It evolves over time as the child's needs, interests, and desires change. In addition to the residential schedule, parenting time also encompasses the right to request and receive information about a child's health, education, and welfare.

When parents separate or divorce, the primary concern is often the welfare and best interests of their children. One of the critical aspects to consider is the decision-making authority and parenting time for each parent. In instances where these matters cannot be immediately resolved, the court may issue a temporary decision-making order.

Navigating the legal landscape following a divorce can be a complex and at times, overwhelming journey. One of the most contentious issues that can arise during this period is the idea of parental relocation. When one parent wants to move, particularly when that move may impact parenting arrangements, it often results in conflict and contention.

When parents are not living together, they face unique challenges, one of which includes making pivotal decisions about their children's lives. These decisions often encompass where the child will live, how much time will each parent spend with the child, and how decisions about the child’s welfare and upbringing will be made. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the critical aspects of decision-making in parenting, the various types of decision-making orders, their implications, and how the law interprets them.

When it comes to determining a child’s living situation, the child's best interest is paramount. The court often has to balance the child's relationship with both parents, the extended family, and the community against the benefit of maintaining continuity in the child's life. This blog post will explore three critical factors that courts weigh in this decision-making process.

The Supreme Court, in the Gordon v. Goertz case, articulated a series of steps to be adhered to in mobility cases. The process commences with the parent proposing the move demonstrating a substantial change in circumstances affecting the child. Once this change is established, a renewed examination of what is in the child's best interests ensues. This assessment takes into account all relevant facets of the child's needs and the capacity of the parents to fulfill them. The crux of this analysis is the child's best interests, not the rights or interests of the parents. The existing custody and access arrangements, the child's views, potential disturbances as a result of a change in custody or relocation, and the custodial parent's reasons for moving all play a crucial role in this evaluation.

Mobility rights, also known as relocation rights, form a significant part of family law. Often, these rights become a point of contention when the primary parent decides to relocate with the children. Such a move can significantly impact the other parent's access to and participation in the children's lives. It's worth noting that any discussion or legal action concerning mobility rights should always prioritize the child's interests over the rights of either parent.

Relocating in parenting cases can be a complex issue, often requiring a nuanced understanding of the law and its implications. It's essential to establish that any relocation is in the child's best interests. This requirement holds true for both an initial parenting application involving a proposed change to the child's habitual residence and a motion to change an existing parenting order. However, each case is unique and highly dependent on its individual facts.

One of the most significant and often complex questions that arise in these cases is the issue of temporary relocation. Usually, this scenario occurs when a parent wishes to move temporarily, often due to an employment opportunity or an educational course in a different location.

The nature of this temporary move, its implications for the child or children involved, and the legal aspects surrounding it can make it a complicated issue to navigate. This post aims to delve deeper into the subject, shedding light on the legal aspects of temporary relocation in parenting cases.

Relocation cases are amongst the most complex and emotional issues tackled in family law. When a custodial parent decides to move and wishes to take their child with them, it can result in a legal dilemma, often requiring a rapid resolution. Let's delve into this topic by exploring the motive for the move, the legal considerations during the interim stage, and the necessity of expedited hearings.

Relocating to a new area can be a daunting endeavor, particularly when it involves children. It is imperative to ensure that the transition is as smooth as possible for the child, considering every aspect of their life in the new location. This blog post aims to discuss three primary considerations for parents planning to relocate with their children, namely, education, childcare and medical care.

In cases of divorce or separation, child relocation can be a contentious issue. Parents may have differing views on the best course of action for the child, with one parent potentially wishing to relocate with the child. The disagreement may stem from concerns about the child's emotional stability, academic continuity, or the ability to maintain a strong relationship with both parents.

Going through a relocation process as a parent with a child can be a complex and challenging situation. It becomes even more complicated when parenting agreements come into play. This blog post aims to guide counsel or legal representatives on how to best handle these situations and represent a parent seeking to relocate with a child.