Parental Relocation After Divorce
Introduction
Navigating the legal landscape following a divorce can be a complex and at times, overwhelming journey. One of the most contentious issues that can arise during this period is the idea of parental relocation. When one parent wants to move, particularly when that move may impact parenting arrangements, it often results in conflict and contention.
Employment-Based Relocation
When a parent seeks to relocate for employment purposes, the opposing parent may argue that similar job opportunities exist in their current location. It is crucial in such instances to present evidence about the availability and suitability of such job opportunities, as well as the long-term health of the local industry in which the relocating parent is employed. This line of argument hinges on the assumption that the relocating parent could maintain their livelihood without necessitating a move. It is important to note that the long-term prospects of the said job, the stability of the industry, and the growth opportunities also play a significant role in the decision-making process.
Relocation for Educational Purposes
Similarly, if a parent seeks to move to attend an educational program, the opposing parent could present evidence of identical or similar programs in their current location. Such evidence would need to show that enrolling in these local programs would not incur the costs of moving, potentially higher accommodation costs, and other living expenses tied to the new location. Concrete evidence about the similarity and availability of such programs is essential for this argument to hold water. Factors like admissions criteria, program duration, course content, and future prospects post-graduation are all relevant considerations in this context.
Relocation for Personal Reasons
In cases where a parent seeks to relocate to be with a new partner or for family support, the opposing parent may challenge the merits of these claims. If the relationship is relatively new, it may be argued that the disruption caused by the move is premature and potentially unwarranted. If the relocation is purportedly for family support, the opposing parent may counter-argue that the family back home is not reliable or that adequate support is available in the current location. The strength of the new relationship, the history of family support or lack thereof, the proximity of other support networks, all these factors can influence the decision.
Conclusion
Parental relocation is a multifaceted issue with several potential grounds for opposition. Regardless of the reason for the move, the opposing parent must provide compelling evidence to support their objections. It requires a careful analysis of the various factors involved, presenting a clear and cogent argument backed by substantial evidence. The ultimate goal is to ensure that the child’s best interests are prioritized, and that the role and influence of both parents in the child’s life are preserved as much as possible. It is a delicate balance that requires careful consideration and dedicated effort on both sides.
THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.
The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.
The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.
No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.
Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.