Termination of Child Support
Introduction
The termination of child support is a complex and often misunderstood area of family law. Especially when the child in question is enrolled in full-time post-secondary education, the process can become particularly intricate. Despite the significant impact it has on both the paying parent and the child, there is a lack of explicit statutory guidance on this matter, leading to potential complications and confusion. This blog aims to shed some light on the criteria for terminating child support under the Family Law Act and the Divorce Act, and discuss common termination events, providing a comprehensive guide for parents navigating this challenging process.
Termination Events for Child Support
In an attempt to avoid potential conflicts and misunderstandings, it is often advised that spouses agree on a set of terminating events for their child over the age of majority. These pre-determined events can provide a roadmap for both parties, outlining when the obligation to provide support may cease. Typical terminating events include instances such as the child's graduation from university, their marriage, or their transition into full-time employment.
However, it is crucial to note that these agreements, while helpful, are not absolute. The court may not always abide by these terms as the overarching principle in child support matters is that the support is the right of the child, and not a privilege bestowed by the parents. In addition, it is also worth noting that the entitlement to child support can be reinstated if dependency is resumed after a period of non-entitlement. For example, if a child returns to school full-time after a brief period of employment, the entitlement to support may be renewed.
Termination Criteria under the Family Law Act
The Family Law Act, one of the key pieces of legislation governing child support, provides specific criteria for terminating child support. According to section 31 of the Act, the obligation to provide support for a child ends upon the earliest of the following events: the child is 16 or older and withdraws from parental control, the child marries, or the child reaches the age of majority (18 years in Ontario) and is not enrolled in a full-time program of education.
However, these criteria, while providing some guidance, might not cover all possible situations. Each case is distinct and subject to individual circumstances. Therefore, the application of these criteria may vary from case to case, depending on the specific facts and circumstances involved.
Termination Criteria under the Divorce Act
The Divorce Act, another essential piece of legislation in this area, presents a different set of criteria for terminating child support. According to this Act, the obligation to provide support extends to children who are under the age of majority and have not withdrawn from parental charge, or are over the age of majority and under parental charge but unable, due to illness, disability or other cause, to withdraw from their charge or to obtain the necessaries of life.
Under the Divorce Act, the termination events are not as concrete, and a combination of the age of majority and dependency determine whether a support obligation continues to exist. This distinction from the Family Law Act underscores the importance of understanding the nuances of different legal texts and their implications for child support.
Conclusion
Terminating child support can be a complex and multifaceted process, with different laws providing varying criteria and guidelines. For spouses navigating this process, discussing and agreeing on potential terminating events can be a practical first step. However, they should also be aware that the court has the ultimate authority in these matters, with decisions based primarily on the child's best interests. Given the complexity of the legal landscape surrounding child support termination, it is highly recommended to seek professional legal advice. This can help ensure that the rights and interests of all parties involved, particularly those of the child, are adequately protected and upheld.
THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.
The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.
The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.
No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.
Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.