Understanding Retroactive Child Support

Child support is an essential part of ensuring the financial well-being of a child when parents separate or divorce. Navigating the complexities of these arrangements can be challenging, and understanding the nuances is crucial for both the paying parent (payor) and the recipient. In instances where support was not provided as obligated, whether due to oversight, miscommunication, or deliberate neglect, retroactive child support comes into play.

Retroactive child support refers to payments that should have been made in the past. The aim is to compensate for the period the child was denied financial support.

Determining Entitlement to Retroactive Support

The entitlement to retroactive support is evaluated based on a comprehensive analysis of four key factors. The factors were established in the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision of D.B.S. v. S.R.G. They include:

  1. The reason for the recipient's delay in claiming support

  2. The conduct of the payor

  3. The child's past and present circumstances

  4. Whether a retroactive award would result in hardship for the payor

Let's delve deeper into each of these factors.

Delays in Claiming Support

The recipient, typically the primary parent, has a legal obligation to seek child support promptly. Any undue delay in doing so could impact the court's decision on awarding retroactive support. However, the court acknowledges circumstances where delay may be deemed reasonable. These circumstances can include fear of a vindictive reaction from the payor, lack of financial resources to pursue a support claim, emotional issues preventing the initiation of the claim, or lack of access to legal advice.

Each situation is unique, so the courts consider the specific details surrounding the delay when making a decision.

Conduct of the Payor

The behavior of the payor can significantly influence the court’s decision. The court examines whether the payor demonstrated blameworthy conduct, defined as any behavior that prioritizes the payor's interests over the child’s right to support.

Examples of blameworthy conduct may include misrepresenting income to lower payment obligations, continually ignoring a support obligation, or using intimidation tactics to dissuade the recipient from claiming support. If such behavior is present, the court is more likely to award retroactive support.

The Child's Past and Present Circumstances

Another factor considered is the needs of the child at the time support should have been paid. If the lack of support did not adversely affect the child’s lifestyle or wellbeing, the courts may be less inclined to order retroactive support. However, if it's evident that the child suffered due to the absence of financial support, this could strengthen the case for retroactive payments.

Potential Hardship to the Payor

The courts are mindful not to order retroactive support that could cause substantial hardship to the payor. Hardship is evaluated relative to the payor’s net worth and ability to pay. The court understands that while it is essential to secure the child's financial wellbeing, it should not be at the expense of severe financial distress to the payor.

To strike a balance, the courts can employ creative solutions, such as structuring a payment plan, to minimize the hardship to the payor while ensuring the child receives the necessary support.

Quantum and Commencement Date

Once entitlement to retroactive support is established, the court will order support to be retroactive to the date of effective notice. This date is defined as any indication by the recipient that child support should be paid or that the current amount needs to be renegotiated.

Legal counsel plays a vital role here. It is crucial for them to voice their child support claims as early as possible in the legal process to preserve their client's right to retroactive support.

Retroactive child support is primarily about providing compensation for periods when support was unlawfully withheld. Therefore, the quantum of support will be calculated based on the correct amount of table support that should have been paid on a year by year basis.

Final Thoughts

Retroactive child support can be a complex and emotionally charged issue. It involves a careful examination of various factors and a nuanced understanding of family law. It is beneficial for both the payor and the recipient to seek professional legal advice when navigating this process. Doing so ensures that the best possible outcome is achieved for the child involved, which is the ultimate goal in any child support arrangement.

THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.

The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.

The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.

No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.

Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.

Previous
Previous

Child Support Guidelines

Next
Next

The Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) and Child Support