Property Rights of Married and Common-Law Spouses in Ontario
Introduction
Property rights, especially in the context of marital and common-law relationships, can often be a complex maze of legalities. In Ontario, the statutory scheme for property division between married couples is clearly laid out, while common-law couples often find themselves in a less charted territory. This blog post will delve into the differences in property rights between married and common-law spouses and will explore concepts such as equitable ownership, unjust enrichment, and trust principles.
Property Rights of Married Spouses
The Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, under Part I, provides a clear framework for property division between married spouses in Ontario. This scheme facilitates an equal division of the couple’s wealth accumulated during the marriage. However, it's important to note that this statutory scheme does not extend to unmarried, common-law couples. Thus, the division of property post-separation is based primarily on who holds the legal title to the asset or liability.
Property Rights of Common-Law Spouses
Common-law spouses, who do not have a legislated scheme for property division, often resort to principles of equitable ownership, such as unjust enrichment, constructive trust, and resulting trust, to establish a claim over property accumulated during the relationship. If these claims are successful, they can result in either a monetary payment or an equitable ownership in the asset. However, the establishment of these claims requires proving contributions (monetary or otherwise) to the property or relationship, which can sometimes be a challenge.
Equitable Ownership and Unjust Enrichment
Equitable ownership, or beneficial ownership, is a concept that kicks in when the legal title is not equitable, based on another’s contributions to the property or relationship. In such cases, the titled owner holds all or part of the property in trust for the non-titled owner. Unjust enrichment is a principle used to establish a claim over property by demonstrating that one spouse has been unjustly enriched at the expense of the other. It’s worth noting that these principles are not limited to common-law spouses and can also be raised by married spouses under certain circumstances.
Conclusion
Understanding the nuances of property rights for married and common-law spouses in Ontario can be a daunting task. The differences between the statutory scheme for married spouses and the principles of equitable ownership and unjust enrichment that often come into play for common-law spouses can considerably affect the division of property following a separation. It is always advisable to seek legal counsel to navigate these complexities and ensure your rights are adequately protected.
THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.
The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.
The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.
No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.
Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.