Lump-Sum Child Support Payments: When and Why They May Be Appropriate

Introduction

Child support is an essential duty owed by parents to their children, ensuring that their financial needs are met after a divorce or separation. Typically, child support is paid periodically, often in monthly installments. However, there are instances where a lump-sum payment, or a combination of lump-sum and periodic payments, may be allowed. These situations, though, carry the risk of being perceived as a redistribution of wealth rather than a support mechanism.

The Guidelines for Lump-Sum Payments

The Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, dictate the procedures for child support payments. Section 11 of these guidelines opens the possibility for lump-sum payments. This provision exists to accommodate unique situations where lump-sum payments may be more appropriate or necessary than periodic ones. Nonetheless, this approach is not without its controversy, as it could be seen as a way of redistributing wealth under the guise of providing support.

Potential Scenarios for Lump-Sum Payments

There are specific circumstances where lump-sum payments might be deemed fitting. For instance, if there’s a serious risk that the payor would not comply with a periodic order, a lump-sum payment would be more suitable. Cases like Trinidad v. Trinidad, [2007] O.J. No. 4801 (S.C.) and Tu v. Tu, [2000] O.J. No. 1336 (S.C.), where an equalization payment and transfer of the matrimonial home was offset against child support arrears and future child support, are examples of such situations.

When the Payor Has Sufficient Capital

Another scenario where lump-sum payments are considered appropriate is when the payor has considerable capital to make a lump-sum payment but limited ongoing ability to make periodic ones. The case of Valenti v. Valenti, [1996] O.J. No. 522 (Gen. Div.), affd [1998] O.J. No. 2242 (C.A.), is a prime example of this circumstance. Here, the capital was leveraged to ensure the child's financial needs were met, even if the payor's future income was uncertain.

Conclusion

Lump-sum child support payments, though not the norm, can sometimes be the most viable option in certain circumstances. Whether it's because of a risk of non-compliance with the periodic order or the payor's financial situation, it's crucial to understand that these arrangements are made with the child's best interest at heart. Despite the controversies, the ultimate goal remains the same: to ensure that children are adequately supported financially, regardless of their parents' marital status.

THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.

The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.

The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.

No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.

Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you. 

Previous
Previous

Undue Hardship Claims in Child Support Cases

Next
Next

Section 12 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines