Joint Family Venture in Family Law

Introduction

In recent times, a significant development in the law of unjust enrichment in the family law sector is the concept of Joint Family Venture (JVF). This term, primarily derived from the business domain, indicates a partnership for mutual profit. However, in the context of family law, it refers to a relationship where both parties contribute in various ways for wealth accumulation and management. The concept of JVF can be a complex one, with numerous factors playing into its identification and application. In this blog post, we'll delve deeper into the concept of JVF, its applicability in unjust enrichment claims, the factors for identifying a JVF, and its application to pensions.

Deeper Understanding of the Joint Family Venture

The term "Joint Family Venture" can be a bit misleading, as it suggests a business-like relationship. However, in the context of family law, it's more about the mutual efforts of both parties in a relationship to accumulate wealth and manage their affairs, with contributions being anything from household labour and childcare to monetary inputs or assets.

In a JFV, both parties work together, pooling their resources and efforts, towards a common goal. The nature of these contributions can vary widely, but the key factor is that both parties are contributing in some way to the collective wealth and well-being of the family.

Applicability of JFV in an Unjust Enrichment Claim

The relevance of the Joint Family Venture comes into play when unjust enrichment has been determined, and the court is considering a monetary award. Unjust enrichment occurs when one party has unfairly benefited at the expense of another. In such cases, the court needs to ascertain whether the parties were involved in a JVF.

If the parties are found to have been engaged in a JVF, the monetary award will be based on the "value survived" approach. This approach calculates the claimant's share of the accumulated wealth, proportionate to their contributions, rather than a simple fee-for-service accounting. This method of calculation can provide a more equitable distribution of wealth, especially in cases where one party's contributions may not have been financial in nature.

Identifying a JFV

Identifying a JFV is not straightforward. There is no automatic presumption of a JFV with cohabiting couples. Instead, the emphasis is on how the couple actually lived their lives. The Supreme Court of Canada has provided a list of factors that help determine whether parties were engaged in a JFV. These include Mutual Effort, Economic Integration, Actual Intent, and Priority of the Family.

However, some factors may suggest the absence of a JVF, such as separate ownership of assets, volatile relationships, and the absence of shared child-rearing responsibilities. Moreover, the existence of factors that are inconsistent with a JVF, such as not having joint bank accounts, separate ownership of vehicles, and not sharing child rearing responsibilities, can also point towards the absence of a JVF.

Application of JFV to Pensions

The JFV concept can potentially be applied to pensions. However, courts have generally been hesitant to do so. In certain cases, the claimant's lack of contribution towards the spouse's career, which led to the pension accumulation, resulted in the pension not being subjected to a JVF award. In other cases, the pension accumulation was solely due to the spouse's employment, which would have continued regardless of the parties' relationship, causing the JFV claim to fail. It's important to remember that each case is unique, and the courts will consider the specific circumstances of each situation when deciding whether to apply the JFV concept to pensions.

Conclusion

The Joint Family Venture is a complex and nuanced concept in family law. Its applicability in unjust enrichment claims, the factors for its identification, and its application to pensions are all areas that require careful consideration. As it stands, the JVF remains a critical tool for ensuring fairness in property division and unjust enrichment cases. However, its application needs to be carefully considered, given the unique circumstances of each case. It's crucial for parties involved in family law disputes to understand the concept of JVF and how it might impact their case.

THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.

The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.

The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.

No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.

Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.