Equalization Payments in Family Law

Introduction

Family law often involves complex and emotionally charged financial decisions, among which equalization payments play a crucial role. Equalization payments refer to the monetary payments made between spouses during a divorce or separation to balance out the division of assets. There are several methods for satisfying equalization payments, and the court can place specific conditions to ensure the payment is fulfilled considering both spouses' financial situations.

Lump-Sum Payment

The most common arrangement for equalization payments is a lump-sum payment. Under section 9(1)(a) of the Family Law Act, one spouse pays a predetermined amount to the other in a single payment. The payment deadline is usually specified, and the payor can use any means within their discretion to obtain these funds. They might choose to sell assets or mortgage property to gather the necessary funds.

Payment Security and Installments

To ensure the payor spouse fulfills their obligation, the court may order them to provide security for the equalization payment. Typically, this security comes in the form of a lien or charge against real property. Alternatively, the court might allow the equalization payment to be made in installments over a period not exceeding ten years, or even permit a delay in payment up to ten years. This method is especially useful when the payment will likely come from the sale of a capital asset in the future, such as the matrimonial home.

Vesting Orders and Property Partition

In some cases, the court can vest interest in property to the recipient spouse to satisfy the equalization payment. However, the person seeking such an order must prove that the other spouse will not comply with the payment, based on their past and reasonably anticipated future behavior. Additionally, the court may order the partition and sale of any property to meet the equalization payment. Typically, this power is used to order the sale of the matrimonial home, although the court is often reluctant to use this power before a trial.

Delayed Payments and Changes in Circumstances

In some circumstances, the court may allow the payment to be delayed for a period not exceeding ten years. This provision is useful when the payment will likely be made from the sale of a capital asset, such as the matrimonial home, which is set to occur in the future. For instance, one party might remain in the matrimonial home for a period following trial, and the equalization payment could be paid from the sale proceeds.

The court may also vary an order for delayed payment or installment payments if there has been a material change in the circumstances of the payor. However, the amount of the equalization payment cannot be changed under this section, nor can the 10-year period be extended.

The Role of the Court

The court plays a significant role in determining the terms of the equalization payment. The court's decision is based on various factors including the recipient’s circumstances, the payor’s financial situation, and the payor’s past actions. The court is empowered to place various terms on the payment arrangement to ensure that the equalization payment is satisfied.

Final Thoughts

Equalization payments are a crucial part of the divorce or separation process, aiming to ensure a fair division of assets between spouses. While the process can be complex, understanding the different methods and terms that can be applied to equalization payments can help spouses navigate through this challenging time.

THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.

The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.

The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.

No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.

Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.

Previous
Previous

Property Preservation in Family Law

Next
Next

Limitation Periods for Claims by Common-Law Partners in Ontario