Equalization Payment Methods under the Family Law Act
Introduction
When it comes to dividing property between spouses after a separation or divorce, the Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, provides a legal framework for equalization. This system does not entitle either spouse to specific assets, but instead gives the spouse with a lower net family property a monetary equalization payment. This post will explore the various methods available for making this payment, their potential tax implications and the flexibility allowed under the Act.
Cash Payment
The simplest method of making an equalization payment is through a direct cash transfer. This could be in the form of a cheque, money order, bank transfer, and so on. One of the major benefits of this method is that there are no tax implications, making it straightforward and uncomplicated.
Spousal Rollover of RRSP
Another option available to a spouse is the rollover of a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) to satisfy the equalization obligation. However, this method has tax consequences, as taxes must be paid when the RRSP is withdrawn in the future. Therefore, the value of the RRSP should be discounted by the recipient’s personal marginal tax rate to account for their future tax liability. Given the complex nature of tax considerations, it may be prudent to consult with a chartered business valuator or accountant for a proper assessment.
Transfer or Sale of Real Property
The Family Law Act also allows for the transfer or sale of real property to fulfill the equalization payment. This could include real estate investments, jewellery, or other valuable assets. However, this method could have future tax implications, especially in the case of real estate investments, which may attract capital gains tax. Therefore, it is vital to consider all future tax and disposition costs and discount the value of the real property appropriately. Again, seeking the advice of an expert may be necessary.
Conclusion
The Family Law Act provides different methods for making equalization payments, each with its own implications and considerations. While cash payments offer simplicity and no tax implications, the rollover of RRSPs or transfer of real property might be advantageous in certain situations despite their potential tax liabilities. Moreover, the Act allows for payment flexibility in cases of potential hardship, including delayed payments or installments. Understanding these options and their implications is crucial to making informed decisions during a divorce or separation.
THIS BLOG IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF LAILNA DHALIWAL LLP.
The Content is offered free of charge strictly on an "as is" basis and is intended to provide users with general information only. Lailna Dhaliwal LLP does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness or fitness of the Content for any particular purpose.
The material provided on the Lailna Dhaliwal LLP/JSDLAW PC website is not intended to provide legal advice or opinions of any kind, and does not constitute legal advice.
No one should act, or refrain from acting, based solely upon the materials provided on this website, without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice.
Sending or receiving of these materials does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Do not provide any confidential information to Lailna Dhaliwal LLP unless and until we have given you a written retainer agreement confirming that we can represent you.